Dumping of Hospital Patients: Isn't There a Law Against This?
Any patient who "comes to the emergency department" requesting "examination or treatment for a medical condition" must be provided with "an appropriate medical screening examination" to determine if he is suffering from an "emergency medical condition". If he is, then the hospital is obligated to provide him either with treatment until he is stable or transfer him to another hospital in conformance with the statute.
Pregnant women fall within the category of having an "emergency medical condition" and must be treated until delivery or transferred appropriately to another facility.
Once patients are admitted to a hospital for inpatient care, EMTALA no longer applies. However, other laws require the hospital to provide appropriate inpatient care or an appropriate transfer and to plan properly for discharge.
EMTALA does not preclude the hospital from billing. Although EMTALA requires hospitals to treat emergency cases even if the patient cannot afford to pay, hospitals are still allowed to bill patients and/or their insurance for the care that is provided.
My son was bitten last Oct by a rattle snake. The local hopital (KRMC) in Kingman, AZ refused to accept my son and forced a life flight to Vegas. The Hospital had the antivenium and was not busy. The doctor just did not want to treat him. There is also another local hospital, and he was not directed to them either. My son almost died, and could have started treatment in less than 30 min. The delays in forcing him to go to Vegas was about 3 hours at an out of pocket cost to me of $20,000 (out of network facilities and physicians). I need help in filing an EMTALA claim against KRMC and the doctor.
